Legal Opinion

Anderson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 2, 1943No. 22525PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is' for the offense of knowingly passing a forged instrument, and the punishment assessed is confinement in the State penitentiary for a term of four years.

There is not any question raised as to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction. The only contention made by appellant relates to the court’s action in overruling his motion to quash the indictment which, omitting the formal parts, reads as follows:

“That on or about the 15th day of December, A.D. 1941, and anterior to the presentment of this Indictment, in the County and State aforesaid…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hickman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903
  2. Daily v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. Hendricks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1888
  4. Simon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1962
  2. Rivas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960
  3. Donald v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957
  4. Donald v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API