Weehunt v. State

It will be observed that the verdict is based wholly upon circumstantial evidence, as will be seen from the evidence introduced by the State. This being true, we do not think it is sufficient to exclude every other reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused. See in this connection Thomas v. State, 65 Ga. App. 26 (14 S. E. 2d, 610); Oliver v. State, 65 Ga. App. 35 (14 S. E. 2d, 609); Newberry v. State, 66 Ga. App. 176 (17 S. E. 2d, 605); Roper v. State, 67 Ga. App. 272 (19 S. E. 2d, 746). The facts in the case of Aikens v. State, 57 Ga. App. 535 (196 S. E. 263), relied upon by…