Legal Opinion

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. Commercial Union Assurance Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 31, 1995No. 94 C 2579PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL UNDERWRITERS TO ANSWER DISCOVERY

LEFKOW, United States Magistrate Judge:

Plaintiff, Great Lakes Dredge and Dock Company, seeks discovery from a group of defendant “Underwriters” concerning the reinsurance or lack thereof of the policies at issue in this litigation. Underwriters vigorously oppose the motion on the basis of irrelevance, disputing all of Great Lakes’ arguments and authorities. Underwriters cite Leksi Inc. v. Federal Insurance Co., 129 F.R.D. 99, 106, 115 (D.N.J.1989); Independent Petrochemical Corp. v. Aetna Cas. & Surety Co., 117 F.R.D. 283,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Leksi, Inc. v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
  2. Independent Petrochemical Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1986
  3. National Union Fire Insurance v. Continental Illinois Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
  4. Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Inc. v. Home Indemnity Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Catholic Mutual Relief Society v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Bryce Corporation v. XL Insurance America, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2023
  3. Catholic Mutual Relief Society v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Catholic Mutual Relief Society v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Estate of Kevin Brown v. City of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API