Legal Opinion

Cehic v. MacK Molding, Inc.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 13, 2006No. 04-353PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. Mack Molding, Inc. appeals from the Commissioner of Labor and Industry’s decision that it is responsible for paying workers’ compensation benefits for its former employee, claimant Ramiz Cehic. The Commissioner, after a contested hearing, concluded that a 1998 injury claimant incurred while employed at Mack Molding, rather than a more recent 2001 lifting incident at a subsequent employer, Pike Industries, was responsible for claimant’s continued impairment and need for back surgery in 2002. On appeal, Mack Molding argues that the Commissioner erred in considering the later lifting…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wood v. Fletcher Allen Health CareSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  2. Kenney v. Rockingham School DistrictSupreme Court of Vermont · 1963
  3. Coburn v. Frank Dodge & Sons & Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  4. Pacher v. Fairdale FarmsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  5. Wroten v. LamphereSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cowlitz Stud Co. v. ClevengerWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Cowlitz Stud Co. v. ClevengerWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Houle v. Ethan Allen, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  4. Colson v. Town of RandolphSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  5. Ehren Hill v. Agri-Mark, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API