Legal Opinion

Forristal v. Security Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 9, 1932No. 30,660PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

This action was brought by Leo Forristal against Security Insurance Company of New Haven, Conn., to reform and enforce an insurance contract. Plaintiff prevailed, and defendant appeals, contending that the contract was not open to reformation, that the plaintiff had no right to such relief and that the trial court erred in the admission of evidence and in the instructions given to the jury.

The plaintiff was the owner of an undivided one-half interest in a crop of wheat. His mother, Helen Forristal, was the owner of 102 acres of land on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Snell v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Pfiester v. Missouri State Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  3. Horine v. Royal InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. John T. Stewart Estate (Inc.) v. FalkenbergSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  5. McIntosh v. North State Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Whittaker v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Stamps v. Consolidated UnderwritersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API