Legal Opinion
United States v. Henrikson
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided May 25, 2016No. CR. 15-50084-JLVPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JEFFREY L. VIKEN, CHIEF JUDGE
INTRODUCTION
Before the court is defendant Terry Henrikson’s motion to dismiss the indictment as time-barred due to the running of the statute of limitations (Dopket 27) and a motion for a Daubert1 hearing. (Docket 29). The government opposes both motions. See Dockets 36 & 37. The court addresses each motion separately.
MOTION TO DISMISS
The government charged Mr. Henrikson in a three-count indictment, alleging theft of government property (count 1), false statement (count 2) and concealment of events affecting benefits (count 3). (Docket 2). To the extent Mr.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Toussie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Pendergast v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. Michael A. YasharCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Glancy v. Taubman Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- United States v. ReeseDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2017
- United States v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018