Legal Opinion
RUFO v. FOX
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 18, 2021No. 2:21-cv-02861Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ANTHONY M. RUFO, et al., Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NO. 21-2861 v. JUDGE IDEE C. FOX, et al., Defendants. PAPPERT, J. November 18, 2021 MEMORANDUM Plaintiffs Anthony Rufo and 325 S. 18th Street, LLC challenge the validity of Pennsylvania’s Abandoned and Blighted Property Conservatorship Act (Act 135), 68 Pa. Stat. §§ 1101-1111, and its impact on the property at 325 S. 18th Street in Philadelphia. The property was placed in an Act 135 conservatorship in the still- pending state court matter of Walsh, et al. v. Isabella,…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.