People v. Van Schoick
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his challenge to the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665). In any event, his argument is without merit. Defendant committed forgery in the second degree by signing a fingerprint card with a false name. It is irrelevant whether the card was blank when signed (see, People v Moore, 171 AD2d 1051, lv denied 77 NY2d 998; People v Hennessy, 133 AD2d 174; People v Kirk, 115 AD2d 758, affd 68 NY2d 722). (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Harvey, J. —…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. KirkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. KirkNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. HennessyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3Cited by3 opinions
- Thornton v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. ReevesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999