Legal Opinion

People v. Van Schoick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 19, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his challenge to the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665). In any event, his argument is without merit. Defendant committed forgery in the second degree by signing a fingerprint card with a false name. It is irrelevant whether the card was blank when signed (see, People v Moore, 171 AD2d 1051, lv denied 77 NY2d 998; People v Hennessy, 133 AD2d 174; People v Kirk, 115 AD2d 758, affd 68 NY2d 722). (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Harvey, J. —…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. People v. KirkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. People v. KirkNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. People v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. People v. HennessyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thornton v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. People v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. People v. ReevesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API