Legal Opinion

Haddad v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1936No. 8438PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Woods, Judge:

This is an action to recover disability benefits under a supplementary contract, issued as part of and attached to a life policy. The circuit court, hearing the case in lieu of a jury upon an agreed statement, entered judgment for the plaintiff; and from that judgment the defendant brings error.

The pertinent portions of the supplementary contract provide:

“If, * * * during the continuance of the policy in full force, due proof shall be presented during the lifetime of the Insured that prior to the anniversary of the policy nearest his sixty-fifth birthday the Insured:

A. Has become…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Iannarelli v. Kansas City Life InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Triplett v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Stanley v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance, New York County Courts1935

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Adkins v. Aetna Life InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Polan v. Travelers Insurance CompanyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Green v. Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Davis v. Combined Insurance Co. of AmericaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Cunningham v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API