Legal Opinion

In Re Hellman

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided July 25, 1979No. 78-B-1864, 78-B-1865PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

CHILSON, Senior District Judge.

James B. Heilman and Marlene Joyce Heilman, husband and wife, filed separate petitions in bankruptcy, numbered respectively 78-B — 1864 and 78-B — 1865. Each bankrupt claimed certain exemptions. The trustee allowed some and disallowed others. The bankrupts filed objections to the trustee’s disallowances. The Bankruptcy Judge consolidated the two cases for the hearing of the objections of the disallowances and sustained the trustee’s disallowance of some of the claims for exemption. The bankrupts appealed from the Bankruptcy Judge’s ruling and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sandberg v. BorstadtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  2. V. H. Carroll, Trustee Holliman Drilling Company, a Corporation v. Lorena Morris Holliman, in the Matter of Holliman Drilling Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  3. Dallemand v. MannonColorado Court of Appeals · 1894

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re LarsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2001
  2. In Re FergusonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1981
  3. In Re ParrishUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1982
  4. In Re AlvarezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1981
  5. In Re JanesofskyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API