Legal Opinion

Leasefirst v. Hartford Rexall Drugs, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided February 26, 1992No. 91-2446-FTPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.

Leasefirst appeals from an order granting relief from a Michigan court judgment docketed in Wisconsin pursuant to sec. 806.24, Stats. Leasefirst argues that the Michigan judgment is not void because the Michigan court had personal jurisdiction over Jack D. Reinholz and Hartford Rexall Drugs, Inc. (Reinholz collectively) due to an enforceable forum selection clause. We conclude that the clause is unconscionable, and we affirm the order granting relief from the Michigan judgment.

A salesperson approached Reinholz at the Hartford Rexall Drugs store to sell a video review machine distributed by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Wassenaar v. PanosWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Discount Fabric House of Racine, Inc. v. Wisconsin Telephone Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Datronic Rental Corp. v. DeSol, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Auto Title Loans, Inc. v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Deminsky v. Arlington Plastics MacHineryWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Kohler Co. v. WixenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
  4. Beilfuss v. Huffy Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
  5. Coady v. Cross Country Bank, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API