Legal Opinion

Hernández v. Muñiz

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico

Decided January 15, 1906No. 58Published

Appeal from the District Court of Mayagiiez. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice MacLeaby

This was a suit brought upon a promissory note, which reads as follows:

“For $1,009.72 provincial money. For the 30th of October, 1898. I promised to pay in the city of Mayagiiez, on the 30th day of October, 1898, to Mr. Antonio Castañer y Morel or to his order, the sum of one thousand and nine dollars and seventy-two cents ($1,009.72) current money, value received to (my) satisfaction. If for any reason the payment cannot be made, and the purchaser should agree to extend the time, I obligate myself to pay interest at the rate of li/2 per cent per month during the time of such extension. For…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Frisch v. CalerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Bank of Shasta v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Scroufe v. ClayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Davanay v. EggenhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Barney v. VigoreauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API