Legal Opinion

Spivey v. Whiddon

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 24, 1990No. S90G0770PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Justice.

The main issue in this case is whether the suit of the plaintiff, Mary Whiddon, for medical malpractice is barred by OCGA § 9-3-72. OCGA § 9-3-72 is a statute of limitation for medical-malpractice actions that are based on foreign objects having been left in patients’ bodies. We find that § 9-3-72 does not bar Whiddon’s action.

After Whiddon’s leg was injured in a car accident, the defendant, Dr. J. W. Spivey, Jr., inserted a screw and washer in her leg to hold bone fragments in a fixed position while the leg healed. Dr. Spivey subsequently removed the screw from the leg, but…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ringewald v. Crawford W. Long Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
  2. Whiddon v. SpiveyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pogue v. GoodmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  2. FASHER PAINTING & DECORATING COMPANY v. BordelonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  3. Norred v. TeaverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  4. Cartwright v. Midtown HospitalCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  5. Angela Norred v. Steven P. TeaverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API