Legal Opinion
In re Ikon Office Solutions, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 13, 2000No. Nos. MDL 1318, 00-87PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
KATZ, Senior District Judge.
Before the court is plaintiffs’ motion for certification of a class of plaintiffs who were participants or beneficiaries in the defendants’ retirement savings plan. Because the court finds that the proposed class meets the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 and that certifying the class at this time will facilitate the fair and efficient resolution of this matter, the motion will be granted.
*460I. Background
The two named plaintiffs, Julia Whetman and Judy Peterson, are former Ikon employees who invested in their employer’s retirement…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- In Re: The Prudential Insurance Company Of America Sales Practices LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Baby Neal v. CaseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- In re Schering Plough Corp. Erisa LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- In re Global Crossing Securities & Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Karcich v. StuartDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- In Re Enron Corp. SecuritiesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
- In re Delphi Corp. Securities, Derivative & "Erisa" LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.