Legal Opinion
In Re Chmura
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided May 30, 2001No. Docket 117565PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AFTER REMAND
Markman, J.
This judicial disciplinary matter is before this Court after remand to the Judicial Tenure Commission (jtc) to determine whether certain public communications engaged in by the respondent during a judicial election campaign violated the Code of Judicial Conduct, Canon 7(B)(1)(d). In In re Chmura, 461 Mich 517; 608 NW2d 31 (2000) (Chmura I), we held that Canon 7(B)(1)(d) was facially unconstitutional. We thereupon narrowed the language of Canon 7(B)(1)(d), holding that a judicial candidate “should not knowingly, or with reckless disregard, use or participate in the use…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Gitlow v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Grievance Administrator v. FiegerMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- Ghanam v. DoesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- In the Matter Of: The Hon. Stephen O. Callaghan, Judge-Elect of the 28th CircuitWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2017
- Wisconsin Judicial Commission v. GablemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- Grievance Adm'r v. FiegerMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.