Legal Opinion

Trentman v. Meritech Mortgage Services (In Re Trentman)

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided March 22, 2002No. 19-60376PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

RICHARD L. SPEER, Bankruptcy Judge.

In the present adversary proceeding, the Plaintiffs seek to avoid a mortgage interest which is now held by the Defendant, Meritech Mortgage Services, Inc. In support of their Complaint, the Plaintiffs allege that this mortgage was improperly executed under Ohio law, and thus is avoidable pursuant to § 544 of the Bankruptcy Code. On the applicability of § 544, the Defendant, in addition to denying the improper execution of its mortgage, raised certain legal defenses which were presented to the Court by way of a Motion for Summary Judgment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Reaves v. Sunset Branch, National Bank of South Dakota (In Re Reaves)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota · 1981
  3. Hembree v. Mid-America Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Echoles v. Transamerica Financial Services (In Re Echoles)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 1982
  5. Hunter v. Bank of New York (In Re Anderson)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Montoya v. Boyd (In Re Montoya)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2002
  2. Akers v. CitiMortgage, Inc. (In Re Akers)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API