Legal Opinion
In re Wiseman
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 22, 1903No. 1,321PublishedCited by 1 opinion
In Bankruptcy. On certificate of referee concerning claim of George K. Hubbard’s administrator.
1Opinion of the Court
J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.
The question for decision arises upon the following facts: John Wiseman, one of the bankrupts, was a surety upon the bond of George R. Hubbard, administrator of the estate of George K. Hubbard. Afterwards George E. Hubbard was discharged from the administration of the estate, and his place was taken by the claimant, who is the administrator de bonisnon. The claim arises in this manner: George R. Huhbard filed an account in the orphans’ court of Philadelphia county, showing a balance due the estate. This account was audited in June, 1896, by one of the judges,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chicago & Vincennes Railroad v. FosdickSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Moch v. Market St. Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1901
- Boyd v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1860
- Commonwealth ex rel. Stub v. StubSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1849
- Commonwealth ex rel. McDonald v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hibberd v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1904