Legal Opinion

PALMER v. WARDEN, MAINE STATE PRISON

District Court, D. Maine

Decided March 18, 2020No. 1:19-cv-00345Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE ROWE PALMER, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) 1:19-cv-00345-JAW ) ) WARDEN, MAINE STATE PRISON, ) ) Respondent ) RECOMMENDED DECISION ON

28 U.S.C. § 2254

PETITION Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, Petitioner argues that his state court conviction for operating under the influence of intoxicants and aggravated assault should be vacated because the trial court improperly admitted evidence of a warrantless blood test. (Petition at 6–11, ECF No. 1.) The State contends that Petitioner’s claim constitutes a Fourth Amendment challenge and thus Petitioner is not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. DeLong v. DickhautCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API