Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Folliard v. CDW Technology Services, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 28, 2010No. Civil Action 07-2009(ESH)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff-relator Brady Folliard (“relator”) brings this qui tarn action under the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 et seq., on behalf of the United States against defendants CDW Technology Services, Inc. (“CDWTS”) and CDW Government, Inc. (“CDWG”) (collectively “CDW”). Defendants now move to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), arguing that another qui tarn complaint, filed two years before the instant complaint, deprives the Court of subject matter jurisdiction under the “first-to-file”…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Graham County Soil & Water Conservation District v. United States Ex Rel. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States of America, Ex Rel. Springfield Terminal Railway Company David A. Fink v. Francis X. QuinnCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- United States ex rel. LaCorte v. SmithKline Beecham Clinical Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- United States of America, Ex rel.linda A. Lujan v. Hughes Aircraft CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States Ex Rel. Hampton v. Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Folliard v. Synnex Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- United States Ex Rel. Shea v. Verizon Business Network Services Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- United States Ex Rel. Heath v. AT & T, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Folliard v. Insight Enterprises, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Kennedy v. Novo A/SDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.