Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Heath v. AT & T, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 10, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2011-1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[Dkt. # 33]
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD J. LEON, United States District Judge
Plaintiff-relator Todd Heath brings suit under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act, 31-U.S.C. §' 3729-3732,- on behalf of the United States government, seventeen states, the District of Columbia, and two cities against AT & T, Inc. and nineteen wholly-owned subsidiaries (together, the “AT & T ‘ defendants”). 1 Compl. [Dkt. # 1]. Heath alleges AT & T, Inc. arid its regional operating companies fraudulently overbilled school districts and libraries from 1997 through 2009 for telecommunications services provided…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States of America, Ex Rel. Springfield Terminal Railway Company David A. Fink v. Francis X. QuinnCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- United States Ex Rel. Hampton v. Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- United States Ex Rel. Batiste v. SLM Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- United States Ex Rel. Batiste v. SLM Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- United States v. Cellco PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States ex rel. Heath v. AT & T, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- USA ex rel. Todd Heath v. AT&T, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015