Legal Opinion
Logan v. City of Pullman
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided October 4, 2005No. CV-04-214-FVSPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE: QUALIFIED IMMUNITY
VAN SICKLE, District Judge.
BEFORE THE COURT is the Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Re: Qualified Immunity, Ct. Rec. 55. Plaintiffs are represented by Darrell Cochran and Thaddeus Martin. Defendants are represented by Andrew Cooley, Stewart Estes, and Kimberly Waldbaum. Defendants Ruben Harris, Don Heroff, Dan Hargraves, and Andrew Wilson, each a member of the Pullman Police Department, move for partial summary judgment on qualified immunity. The Court has reviewed the memoranda…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Whitley v. AlbersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Timothy Nelson v. City of DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Elphage v. GautreauxDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2013
- Grigoryan v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
- Brace v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Nelson v. City of DavisDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.