Legal Opinion

Bigby v. Cockrell

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 28, 2003No. 99-11262PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARL E. STEWART, Circuit Judge:

Petitioner-Appellant, Gary Eugene Big-by (“Bigby”), appeals the district court’s denial of his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus regarding his claim that, by declining to recuse himself after Bigby assaulted him, the trial judge denied Bigby his constitutional right to due process. Prominent among other claims raised by Bigby is his Penry claim that punishment phase jury instructions prevented the jury from acting upon mitigating evidence submitted in his behalf. For the reasons assigned herein, we affirm the conviction, reverse the district court’s denial of a…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Tennard v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Tice v. WilsonDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Hughes v. DretkeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  4. Bagwell v. DretkeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  5. Bigby v. DretkeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API