Sauntry v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota.
1Opinion of the Court
CARLAND, District Judge.
This action was brought by the United States against the plaintiffs in error to recover damages for cutting and taking away from lands of the United States timber standing and growing thereon. At the trial of the case in the court below there were two contested questions of fact: (i) Did the plaintiffs in error cut any timber from the lands described in the complaint? (2) If so, how much timber was cut by them? It appeared from the evidence that the timber was cut from the lands in question between October 1, 1887, and May 1, 1891. The United States discovered the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mine & Smelter Supply Co. v. Parke & Lacy Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
3Cited by7 opinions
- Resurrection Gold Min. Co. v. Fortune Gold Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Harrold v. Territory of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Gotham Silk Hosiery Co. v. Artcraft Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- In re JohnsonDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1911
- United States v. CowartDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.