Legal Opinion

First State Bank of Roby v. Hilbun

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 26, 1933No. 1125PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKMAN, Chief Justice.

The plaintiff in error will be called plaintiff, and the defendant in error defendant. The suit was instituted by plaintiff against defendant on a promissory note signed as follows: “J. C. Hilbun, .Liquidating Agt., First National Bank, Roby, Texas, by J. C. Hilbun.” At the time the note was executed, the defendant was cashier of the plaintiff bank, and was also liquidating agent for the First National Bank. The latter bank had gone into voluntary liquidation and had elected the defendant to wind up its affairs. It was not insolvent and was not! taken over by the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Haupt v. VintWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Johnson v. Armstrong & MesserTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Elwell v. TatumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
  4. Heard v. CleggCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. Shelton v. Montoya Oil & Gas Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Nishimatsu Construction Co., Ltd. v. Houston National Bank, Defendant-Third Party v. Jack D. Baize, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  2. Stone v. WattCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  3. Gulf Freeway Lumber Co. v. Houston Investment Realty TrustCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  4. Gittings, Neiman-Marcus, Inc. v. EstesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  5. Turner & Co. v. Graham Gin Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API