Legal Opinion

D'Arbonne Construction Co. v. Foster

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 25, 2002No. 01-661PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAY THORNTON,

Justice. The court of appeals certified this case to us for an interpretation of Rule 54(b) of Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure. The issue presented is whether the appeal must be dismissed because the names “John Doe 1” and “John Doe 2” remain included in the caption of the case. No specific order was entered by the trial court disposing of any claim that might have been made against the two John Doe defendants, but the matter was completely tried and a verdict was entered which allocated 100 percent of the liability to two named defendants, while dismissing the other named…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shackelford v. Arkansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Cortese v. Atlantic RichfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. National Home Centers, Inc. v. ColemanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  2. Searcy Farm Supply, LLC v. Merchants & Planters BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  3. McKibben v. MullisCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
  4. D'Arbonne Const. Co., Inc. v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
  5. D'Arbonne Const. Co., Inc. v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API