Legal Opinion

Shultz v. Sanders

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 15, 1884PublishedCited by 13 opinions

On petition and affidavits.

1Opinion of the Court

Van Fleet, V. C.

The petitioners, Louis and Clara Eisberg, were the purchasers of the mortgaged premises sold under the decree made in this cause. They ask to be relieved from their contract. They say they bid for the mortgaged premises believing that, if they were struck off to them, they would acquire a title in fee simple absolute, but they have ascertained, since their purchase, that the suit is, in essential particulars, so defective that a good title cannot be made. And for this reason, they say they ought not to be compelled to carry out their contract.

The mortgage on which the suit is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mills v. DennisNew York Court of Chancery · 1818

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. AndersonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
  2. Caruso v. CarusoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  3. Hyland v. KirkmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  4. Andes v. BoyajianNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  5. Epstein v. BenderskyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API