Hopi Tribe v. Q.T.
Hopi Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
This opinion and order addresses the questions 1) whether the presenting officer must introduce evidence that marijuana is a controlled substance as an essential element of the prosecution’s case in chief, and 2) whether the trial court’s denial of Appellant’s motion for a directed verdict is an abuse of discretion.
SYNOPSIS
Appellant, a minor child, appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion for directed verdict. Appellant was charged with violation of Ordinance 21, Section 3.3.90, Possession or Distribution of Alcohol or Controlled Substance In, On or Near Schools,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & YoungArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- Shoen v. ShoenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- People v. SprouseColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re J.P.Hopi Appellate Court · 2010