Legal Opinion

State Highway Commission v. Stadler

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 8, 1944No. 35,852PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.:

In this action the State Highway Commission seeks to recover damages for the destruction of a bridge on a public highway. The judgment in the district court was for the replacement cost of the bridge less depreciation for the period of time it had been in use. The commission appeals.

The defendants make some complaint regarding rulings of the trial court in permitting the plaintiff to amend its petition after the trial and with respect to the legal effect of such amendments but, since there' was no cross-appeal, those complaints will be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. J. W. Paxson Co. v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Cumberland CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1912
  2. State Highway Commission v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  3. City of Wichita v. BolesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  4. West v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. Black Diamond Collieries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Greep v. BrunsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  2. Goodloe v. Jo-Mar Dairies Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  3. State Ex Rel. McKinney v. RichardsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Estates of Wright v. PizelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  5. State v. F. W. Fitch Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API