Legal Opinion · Dissent

Murff v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 25, 1914No. 3271Published

The opinion states the case.

1Dissent

HARPER, Judge (partly concurring and partly dissenting).

In concurring with Judge Davidson in granting the rehearing and reversing and remanding the case, I do not want to be understood as agreeing to that part of his opinion which holds that the plea of former jeopardy should have been sustained. On this question I concur in the opinion of Presiding Judge Prendergast. It is true that appellant had been acquitted of the crime of rape, and that a portion of the elements of. that offense was that he had carnal intercourse with Viola Johnson, but another element of that offense was that the girl…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cooper v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
  2. Gill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  3. Mathis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  4. Millner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Morgan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API