Legal Opinion

People v. Martin

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 26, 1954No. Crim. 3037PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD (Fred B.), J.

In support of his appeal from a judgment entered upon conviction of second degree burglary, with three priors, defendant Jack Martin urges a number of points.

He says there was no sworn complaint and no preliminary hearing. Counsel for the state says there were. The record is silent. In such a case there is a presumption that the information was regularly issued, hence was preceded by a sworn complaint and a preliminary hearing. Moreover, this is a point which a defendant is precluded from making except by timely motion to set the information aside, as provided in section 996…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. People v. BonillaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. In Re RazutisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. People v. BaileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. People v. GrischottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. CarveloHawaii Supreme Court · 1961
  2. People v. DupreeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. People v. ShannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. People v. LoganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. People v. NunezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API