People v. Nunez
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JANES, J.
Defendant appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of the first degree burglary of a telephone booth. The information originally charged defendant with an additional count of burglary of the telephone booth by use of explosives (Pen. Code, § 464). Before impanelment of a jury, the explosives count was dismissed on the motion of the People after the prosecutor told the court the evidence would show a burglary of a telephone booth by use of a hand gun.
The contentions raised on appeal are: (1) Under Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 [16 L.Ed.2d…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Brookhart v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. LaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- People v. OrtegaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. PoddarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. MacKabeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- People v. KozelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- People v. HesslinkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.