Legal Opinion

People v. Nunez

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 15, 1970No. Crim. 5228PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JANES, J.

Defendant appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of the first degree burglary of a telephone booth. The information originally charged defendant with an additional count of burglary of the telephone booth by use of explosives (Pen. Code, § 464). Before impanelment of a jury, the explosives count was dismissed on the motion of the People after the prosecutor told the court the evidence would show a burglary of a telephone booth by use of a hand gun.

The contentions raised on appeal are: (1) Under Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436 [16 L.Ed.2d…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Brookhart v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. People v. LaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. OrtegaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. PoddarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. People v. MacKabeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. People v. KozelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. People v. HesslinkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API