Legal Opinion

State v. Dunivan

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 6, 1925PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBradley, J.

Defendant was charged by information with the possession of whiskey in violation of section 6588, Revised Statutes 1919, as amended by Laws of 1921, p. 413, and was convicted. Failing to get a new trial, he appealed.

The question of consequence presented in the record is the action of the trial court in overruling a motion to suppress the evidence alleged to have been obtained by an unlawful seizure and search. There is no claim that the officer had any kind of a warrant. The officer, W. M. Hurn, a special policeman at the time in the city of Kennett, merely on suspicion arrested defendant,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. GrantSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882
  2. State v. AimeUtah Supreme Court · 1923
  3. People v. MargelisMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Ash v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  5. Wehmeyer v. MulvihillMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. HardySupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  2. State v. ParkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  3. People v. PerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. State v. HumphreySupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  5. Jones v. SchaffnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API