Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Conser

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 8, 1994No. CV91-0752; CA A79922PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Wife appeals and husband cross-appeals from a dissolution judgment. She assigns error to the trial court’s property division and he assigns error to the court’s award of spousal support. On de novo review, ORS 19.125(3), we modify the properly division and affirm the award of spoused support.

The parties were married in July, 1978. Their marriage was dissolved in December, 1992. They have one child, age 9. At the time of trial, husband was 53 years old, and wife was 46 years old. Both parties are in relatively good health. Husband graduated from high school and attended one year of college.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of Marriage of FollansbeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Marriage of Conser v. ConserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API