Legal Opinion

Krinsky v. Winston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 21, 1969PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action by a partner or joint adventurer against his other partners or joint adventurers and others, inter alia, to adjudge that the partnership or venture is entitled to certain land, pursuant to the terms of oral agreements, defendants appeal from an order of the 'Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated June 17, 1968, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff’s claims are barred by the applicable Statutes of Fraud (General Obligations Law, § 5-701, subd. 1; § 5-703). Order affirmed, without costs. Seemingly, the oral agreements…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sanger v. . FrenchNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Mattikow v. SudarskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Dayvault v. Baruch Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McCall v. FramptonNew York Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Timberline R & G Building Co. v. SigurjonssonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Sujecki v. O'BriskieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API