People v. Holman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed in accordance with the following Memorandum: Defendant’s conviction is supported by legally sufficient evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). County Court properly denied the motion of defendant to suppress his statements to the police because defendant did not unequivocally invoke his right to counsel (see, People v Glover, 87 NY2d 838, 839; People v Santiago, 72 NY2d 836, 837-838; People v Fridman, 71 NY2d 845, 846). In addition, defendant’s indelible right to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. YuklNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- People v. KeindlNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. WestNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. WarrenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. HiltsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. OgbornAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. WarrenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.