Legal Opinion

Stephen S. Kelley v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 26, 1956No. 12857PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAHY, Circuit Judge.

In Kelley v. United States, 95 U.S.App. D.C. 267, 221 F.2d 822, we reversed appellant’s earlier conviction of robbery and remanded the case for a new trial, with opportunity for pre-trial proceedings with respect to the competency of the accused to stand trial. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4244 (1952) such proceedings were had, resulting in a judicial determination that appellant was competent to stand trial. He was retried, was again convicted and again appeals.1

We dispose first of appellant’s contention that the prosecution failed to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Bram v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Stein v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Durham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  5. George Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. MacOnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  2. Alfred F. Fagundes, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1965
  3. Blue v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Milton R. Dusky v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  5. John A. Naples v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API