Legal Opinion

Diecidue v. Isacks

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 19, 1953No. 3663Published

1Opinion of the Court

ELLIS, Judge.

Plaintiffs filed this suit in which they allege that they were the owners of Lot No. 364 in North Oak Lawn Subdivision of the Parish of St. Tammany, and that the defendant had cut 90' large pine trees measuring 13 to 16 inches in diameter two feet from the ground of a value of $1,530 and accordingly prayed for judgment in said amount.

The plaintiff filed an exception of no cause or right of action to the defendant’s reconventional demand, which was overruled by the lower court.

After trial the lower court was of the opinion that the plaintiffs had failed to substantiate their claim…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rigney v. MonetteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1893
  2. Taft v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API