Legal Opinion

Carlos Ruggles Lumber Co. v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 30, 1927PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is a petition under G. L. c. 63, § 77, by a domestic corporation having its principal place of business at Springfield in this Commonwealth for the abatement of an excise tax assessed upon it for the year 1924. The case is reserved for our determination on the petition, answer, and an agreed statement of facts. The pertinent facts are that the petitioner during the year in question was engaged solely in buying lumber and lumber products in States other than Massachusetts and, selling the same in other States including Massachusetts. It had no lumber yard, and no lumber or lumber products…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Champlain Realty Co. v. Town of BrattleboroSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Southern Pacific Co. v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Cream of Wheat Co. v. County of Grand ForksSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Hamilton Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1868

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Armburg v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. Thomas G. Jewett, Jr. Inc. v. Keystone Driller Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Hood Rubber Co. v. Commissioner of Corp. & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Opinion of the Justices to the Governor & CouncilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  5. McLaughlin v. Municipal Court of Roxbury DistrictMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API