Legal Opinion

Ponderosa-Nevada, Inc. v. Venners

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1976No. File 11721PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINANS, Justice.

This is an action, brought under the Uniform Declaratory Judgment Act, SDCL 21-24, vyhich seeks to define the legal status of a certain piece of property. Plaintiff initially filed a complaint for reformation, but later amended its complaint to one for declaratory judgment, seeking a declaration that an option agreement had been canceled by the terms of a compromise agreement. The defendants filed a counterclaim for specific performance of the option agreement. The trial court found that the option agreement had not been compromised by the compromise agreement and granted…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Byre v. WieczorekSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Elliott v. RichterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  3. Jones v. American Oil CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Newton v. EricksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Richter v. Industrial Finance Co. Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ducheneaux v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Enchanted World Doll Museum v. BuskohlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Holzer v. Dakota Speedway, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Ralph E. Mueller and Eugene D. Devane, Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. Hubbard Milling Company, Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  5. GMS, INC. v. Deadwood Social Club, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API