Ponderosa-Nevada, Inc. v. Venners
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WINANS, Justice.
This is an action, brought under the Uniform Declaratory Judgment Act, SDCL 21-24, vyhich seeks to define the legal status of a certain piece of property. Plaintiff initially filed a complaint for reformation, but later amended its complaint to one for declaratory judgment, seeking a declaration that an option agreement had been canceled by the terms of a compromise agreement. The defendants filed a counterclaim for specific performance of the option agreement. The trial court found that the option agreement had not been compromised by the compromise agreement and granted…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Byre v. WieczorekSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Elliott v. RichterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
- Jones v. American Oil CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
- Newton v. EricksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
- Richter v. Industrial Finance Co. Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ducheneaux v. MillerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Enchanted World Doll Museum v. BuskohlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Holzer v. Dakota Speedway, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Ralph E. Mueller and Eugene D. Devane, Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. Hubbard Milling Company, Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- GMS, INC. v. Deadwood Social Club, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.