Legal Opinion
Charles v. City of Marion
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana
Decided March 22, 1900No. 9,755PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Amended Bill in Equity.
1Opinion of the Court
BAKER, District Judge.
'This suit has been before the court on an application for a temporary restraining order. Charles v. City of Marion, 98 Fed. 166. It is now before the court on a demurrer to the amended bill of complaint, on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action entitling the complainant to equitable relief. The suit is brought to restrain the defendants from establishing and enforcing an assessment for the whole cost of paving a street bordering on lots and parcels of land owned by the complainant. The proceedings are had under the act of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Stuart v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Quill v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. EdgertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Palmer v. StumphIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- King v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- State v. Robert P. Lewis Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Parker v. City of DetroitU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1900
- Zehnder v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1901
- Adams v. City of ShelbyvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1900