Legal Opinion
Bailey v. Miltope Corp.
District Court, M.D. Alabama
Decided January 8, 2007No. 2:05-cv-1061-MEFPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MARK E. FULLER, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff brings suit against Defendant Miltope Corporation, alleging that it violated his rights under the Family and Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq. (“FMLA”). Plaintiff seeks compensatory damages, injunctive relief, and attorney’s fees and costs. This cause is presently before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 17). The Court has carefully considered the pleadings, briefs, and evidentiary submissions. For the reasons stated herein, Defendant’s motion is due to be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
I…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- John D. Chapman v. Ai TransportCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jadwin v. County of KernDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009