In re the Estate of Palomares
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, refusing to vacate a decree setting apart certain property for the use and benefit of minor children. Andres Briswalter, the appellant, was a judgment- creditor of the deceased. The remaining facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMyrick, J.
The deceased died intestate, leaving him surviving, a widow and four minor children. Letters of administra*403tian were regularly issued, and appraisers duly appointed. An inventory and an appraisement were duly made and returned on the 14th of February, 1882, with the affidavits required by the Code, from which it appeared that the estate of the deceased consisted of a piece of land of the value of §1,440. On the 17th of February, 1882, the administrator presented and filed a petition, stating the above facts, and that the widow had property of her own, and did not require any allowance, and…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Eisenmayer v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Addison v. FleenorWyoming Supreme Court · 1948
- Estate of AtwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- De Ledesma v. StanleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Wills v. BoothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.