Legal Opinion

Danico v. Ford

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 12, 1941No. 45324PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOliver, J.

Plaintiff, John B. Brooks, alleged that in August, 1922, he entered into an oral agreement .with defendant, M. A. Ford, in which they formed an equal partnership for the purpose of manufacturing files and other metal products at Davenport, Iowa, and that said partnership and business was still in operation; that defendant had recently refused to recognize the existence of said partnership, had taken over said business and the partnership assets and refused to account therefor, and that said assets were being wasted. Plaintiff prayed for the dissolution of the partnership, an accounting of its…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Quarton v. American Law Book Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  3. Malvern National Bank v. HallidaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  4. Canfield Lumber Co. v. Kint Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  5. Olson v. BrisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Glass v. Minnesota Protective Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  2. Nelson v. BarnickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  3. Olson v. BarnickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  4. Cantrell v. CurnuttNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API