Chapman v. McNeil
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MAUS, Judge.
Upon the receipt of a report prescribed by § 577.041, the Director of Revenue revoked the driver’s license of the appellant for one year because of the appellant’s refusal to submit to a chemical test to determine the amount of alcohol in his blood. On the appellant’s petition for review the trial court determined each issue prescribed by § 577.041.2 in the affirmative. It entered judgment against the appellant.
At the outset, it must be noted that many of appellant’s arguments are premised upon an erroneous view of the evidence. For example, he argues, “There is no evidence in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Spradling v. DeimekeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
- Aron v. Director of Revenue, State of Mo.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1987
- Stenzel v. State, Department of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- State v. KimballMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- State v. ByerlyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hawk v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MO.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Ruth v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MO.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Wei v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- Krtek v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Travis Rader v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.