Legal Opinion

Gist v. Mulligan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 22, 2009PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1232Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Commissioner of the Westchester Department of Planning dated January 4, 2006, which, after a hearing, confirmed the termination of the petitioner’s participation in the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program {see 42 USC § 1437f [b] [1]).

Adjudged that the petition is granted, on the law, without costs or disbursements, to the extent that so much of the determination as confirmed the penalty of termination is vacated; the petition is otherwise denied, the determination is otherwise confirmed on the merits, and the matter…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Featherstone v. FrancoNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Kreisler v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Sicardo v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. Gonzalez v. MulliganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Holcomb v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Alexander v. RheaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. A.A. Goode v. Housing Authority of the City of ShamokinCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Current v. New Orleans Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2024
  5. Matter of Gramble v. Putnam County Hous. Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API