Legal Opinion
Doe v. Dickenson
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided April 30, 2009No. CV-07-01998-PHX-GMSPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
G. MURRAY SNOW, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment of the City of Phoenix (Dkt. # 154), which has been joined in part by Defendant Bill Franklin Dickenson (Dkt. # 165). For the reasons explained below, the Court grants the motion as it pertains to the City of Phoenix, grants the motion as it pertains to the Eighth Amendment claim against Dickenson, and denies the motion as it pertains to the familial association claim against Dickenson. 1
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff John Doe, a minor, alleges that he was molested by Defendant Dickenson on several occasions…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- K.T. v. Pittsburg Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Pauls v. GreenDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2011
- Tucson Unified School District v. BorekCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Charlotte Tsosie v. United States of America, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2025
- Kretsch v. BartonDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.