Legal Opinion

Crosby v. City of Detroit

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 10, 1983No. Docket 59169PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals as of right from the Wayne County Circuit Court’s order of July 10, 1981, granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to GCR 1963, 117.2(1) and 117.2(3), failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and no genuine issue of material fact.

Plaintiff’s complaint alleged that while he was employed by Rocco Ferrera Construction Company in the construction of a sewer tunnel for the City of Detroit, he was overcome by fumes emitted by various equipment and machinery and, as a result, he fell and was injured. The construction of the sewer tunnel was part of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mitcham v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Parker v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Thomas v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Rosario v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Gerzeski v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hadfield v. Oakland County Drain CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Cousineau v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Carney v. Department of TransportationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Burse v. Wayne County Medical ExaminerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Jenkins v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API