Legal Opinion
Mayer v. Town of Brookhaven
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 15, 1999PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover dam*361ages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated August 17, 1998, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment and denied her cross motion to compel disclosure.
Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment and substituting therefor a provision denying the motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff.
The plaintiff seeks to recover damages incurred when she was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Amabile v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Kiernan v. ThompsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- ITT Hartford Insurance v. Village of OssiningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Yarshevitz v. Town of North HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
3Cited by13 opinions
- George v. Marshalls of MA, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Frullo v. Incorporated Village of Rockville CentreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Perrington v. City of Mount VernonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Gerena v. Town of BrookhavenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Blade v. Town of North HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.