United States v. Creek Nation
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtDurfee, Senior Judge
The United States, defendant-appellant, has taken an interlocutory appeal from a decision and Interlocutory Order of the Indian Claims Commission, 26 Ind. Cl. Comm. 410 (1971), Commissioner Blue separately concurring and Commissioner Kuykendall dissenting.
In its petition plaintiff claimed additional compensation under Section 2, Clauses 8 or 5 of the Indian Claims Commission Act of 1946 for 5,200,000 acres of land in Alabama which it ceded' to the United States by the Treaty of March 24, 1832, 7 Stat. 366. The Creeks have a compensable interest in the 5,200,000 acres of land; title is not in…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Yankton Sioux Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- Red Lake Band v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Seminole Nation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Chippewa Cree Tribe of the Rocky Boy's Reservation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Northern Paiute Nation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.