Legal Opinion

State v. Barg

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 10, 1986No. C5-86-671PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

This sentencing appeal involves the applicability of “good time” under Minn.Stat. § 244.04 against a probationary jail sentence. The trial court refused to credit appellant’s executed prior sentence for time spent as a condition of the original probationary sentence. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Douglas Barg pleaded guilty to criminal sexual conduct in the third degree in 1983 and received an 18 month stayed sentence, with one year in the Northeast Regional Correctional Center (NERCC) and three years probation. Appellant served 12 months at NERCC. On March 22, 1986 he…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. RandolphSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Holecek v. RossCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  2. State v. BargSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  3. State v. BargSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API